Aimee Mann Lyrics and Gendered Language Patterns :: Free Essays Online

Aimee Mann Lyrics and Gendered Language Patterns Paul Thomas Anderson claims that many of the characters for his dissipate Magnolia1 were shake up by Aimee Mann lyrics and from knowing Aimee as a personal friend. As the pic unfolds, the main theme of connectivity between the characters hold ups apparent. If they are non connected in a physical counsel, they each are in a exemplary way linked as they deal with the necessity of love. Several generation it is spoken in the film how somevirtuoso has love to give, but does not know how to memorialise it. The character Claudia, which Anderson said was played with a accredited sense of Aimee Mann insanity2, is so desperate for love and to be inevitable yet when Jim offers his love to her, she is so terrified that she runs from it. Here Anderson decides to not scarce refer to Aimee Mann, but actually has Claudia state to Jim a lyric from Aimees song Deathly Now that Ive met you would you object to never visual percepti on me again?3 As Claudia runs from the restaurant it is clear that being needed in a relationship distresses her, the same emotion Aimee4 reveals in her song lyric. As Anderson uses a song lyric as text in the films dialogue, the question of how lyrics can be looked at in basis of conversational content is raised. In showing how hands and women speak otherwise Tannen cites many kinds of examples in You Just Dont Understand. Not lonesome(prenominal) does she look at experimental and observational studies, she also includes excerpts from plays and short stories to show that speech patterns carry over into artistic expression5. Lyrics then can be examined in this same manner though they are a diametrical type of conversation. If a play is two or more characters conversing with one another on stage, a song lyric can be viewed as one side of a story of dialogue. It does not become any less conversational because of this, but is a different way to interpret a relat ionship. Deborah Tannen has achieved scholarly and public praise for her conclusions about how women and men differ in conversational styles. You Just Dont Understand6 clarifies rhetorical differences in how the two sexes communicate with each other.