Comparing Journeys in Thos Pynchons The Crying of Lot 49 :: Comparison Compare Contrast Essays

Parallel Journeys in The Crying of Lot 49 The Crying of Lot 49 offers ii journeys into the text that of its protagonist Oedipa, and that which the subscriber is forced to take with her. His brilliant physical exercise of item and word plays blur the lines between the two. The main factor in this journey is chaos, here referred to by its more scientific name entropy. Oedipa and the reader get lost in a system of chaos and the task of drawing the clues within the intricate system. The reader has no choice but to proceed part of this system through with(predicate) cleverly employed tactics Pychon uses to whiff one in. The uncertainty and complication of the mystery are the devices typically apply to bring a character and or reader to an understanding of oneself, in this case it is questionable whether Oedipa or the reader reach this sort of consciousness. Oedipa through Pynchons scientific/literary metaphors, has a personal awakening that is not instead resolved with the e nd of the novel. The reader and the protagonist are both odd to question what is real and what is fantasy. Pynchon offers clues to the puzzle, but the truth in question is not the Trystero, but Oedipas sanity. Oedipa Mass is forced to involve herself in what seems to be a conspiracy. Her job can be compared to that of Maxwells Demon. As the Demon sat and sieve his molecules into hot and cold, the system was said to lose entropy. But somehow the release was offset by the information the Demon gained about what molecules were where (p.105). Perception is film over in the novel through the use of alcohol and drugs and the blurring of communication systems. In this case a form of entropy linked to the chaos of a communication system is embodied by the W.A.S.T.E. system Oedipa stumbles upon. She must tone-beginning to separate what is real and what is fantasy, to decipher what is important and what is useless information. Pynchons use of detail makes this a difficult task, and the reader is caught up in her world of symbols and imagery. His multifariousness of fiction with history further confuses the reader with the Thurn and Taxis system and the Peter Piguid parliamentary procedure one is drawn into a world where he/she is reliant upon Oedipa to decipher the clues. Oedipa and the reader are drawn into a constant fear of paranoia.